4.7 Article

Countereffect of glutathione on divalent mercury removal by nanoscale zero-valent iron in the presence of natural organic matter

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 398, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122874

Keywords

Nanoscale zero-valent iron; Divalent mercury; Reduction; Natural organic matter; Glutathione

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2020R1A2C2004255]
  2. GIST Research Institute (GRI) grant - GIST in 2020
  3. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea [GIST-08] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although there have been multiple studies on the effects of natural organic matter (NOM) on zero-valent iron (ZVI) removal of several regulated heavy metal ions from contaminated water, the role of NOM on Hg(II) removal by nanoscale ZVI (nZVI) has not yet been studied. The experimental results showed that in the presence of 100 mg L-1 of Suwannee River NOM (SRNOM), the Hg(II) removal ratio by nZVI decreased from 89% to 36% after 80 min of reaction. Similar trends were observed in the long-term test maintained for 15 days, attributable to the surface passivation of nZVI by SRNOM. In contrast, addition of 100 mu M glutathione (GSH) to the nZVI suspensions increased the Hg(II) removal ratio from 85% to 96% after 15 days of reaction. Furthermore, adding 100 mu M of GSH to the nZVI and SRNOM suspensions largely improved the removal efficiency of Hg(II) to be > 99% after 9 days of reaction, related to the enhanced dissolution of Fe(II) and consequent formation of lepidocrocite and maghemite on the nZVI surface. The addition of thiolic compounds is suggested as a promising step in overcoming the inhibitory effect of SRNOM for the remediation of Hg(II) using nZVI technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available