4.5 Article

Contribution of melanoidins from heat-processed foods to the phenolic compound intake and antioxidant capacity of the Brazilian diet

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE
Volume 57, Issue 8, Pages 3119-3131

Publisher

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-020-04346-0

Keywords

Melanosaccharides; Melanoproteins; Maillard reaction; Bioactive compounds

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  3. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
  4. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study we aimed at studying, determined and estimated the daily intake the contents of melanoidins and of their phenolic-bound compounds, and the antioxidant capacity of thermally processed foods regularly consumed in the Brazilian diet. Among twenty-three heat-processed Brazilian food samples, melanoidins contents ranged from 1.6 (dulce de leche) to 21.4 g/100 g (soluble coffee). Considering melanosaccharides, roasted mate showed the highest content of bound phenolics (6415.1 mu g/100 mg), whereas whole grain breakfast cereals (229.3 mu g/100 mg) stood out among melanoproteins. The antioxidant capacity of melanoidins was strongly correlated with their bound phenolic compounds (r > 0.8522, p < 0.0001). We estimated that up to 10.7 g of melanoidins are daily consumed by the Brazilian population, with beer the major contributor (44%), followed by cereal products (36%) and coffee (17%). Brazilians ingest up to 26.0 mg of bound phenolics a day, mainly from coffee (75%) and beer (13%) melanoidins. Therefore, the estimated intake of phenolic compounds by Brazilians is underestimated by up to 7%. Moreover, melanoidins contribute to up to 21% of the Brazilian dietary antioxidant capacity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available