4.7 Article

Wakes of wall-bounded turbulent flows past patches of circular cylinders

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 892, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.102

Keywords

wakes; shear layers; turbulent boundary layers

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/P021476/1]
  2. Compagnia di San Paolo through the project 'Attrarre Docenti di qualita tramite Starting Grant'

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The properties of the wake generated by a porous body fully immersed in a turbulent boundary layer are experimentally assessed. The body consists of an array of cylinders, with diameter , covering a circular patch of diameter . For fixed and , by increasing the number of cylinders, , within the patch, the wake properties are systematically tested under different levels of density ( covered planar area per total surface) and compared to the flow past a solid body of equivalent diameter and height (). Some insights on the complex flow developing in the wake are captured: varying in the range 2 %-24 % results in the flow meandering among the cylinders and bleeding from the top, the sides and the trailing edge of the patch. The interplay between trailing edge and top bleeding prevents wake entrainment, locking the wake longitudinal extent to 5-7 patch diameters, regardless of the density level. Due to the finite body vertical extent, a third shear layer develops from the top of the patch. The interaction between the top shear layer and the lateral ones leads to a mutual alteration, namely a nonlinear growth not captured by the classical mixing layer theory. Nevertheless, on the horizontal plane at the patch mid-height, the mean flow recovers, exhibiting a self-similar decay. Surprisingly, the recovery is well described by the classical planar wake theory and the characteristic scales, namely the maximum velocity deficit and the wake half-width, evolve linearly as proposed by Wygnanski et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 168, 1986, pp. 31-71).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available