4.2 Article

Chemical fixation of toxic metals in stainless steel pickling residue by Na2S•xH2O, FeSO4•6H2O and phosphoric acid for beneficial uses

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 364-374

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2019.12.016

Keywords

Stainless steel pickling residue; Leaching toxicity; Cr(VI); Chemical fixation; Beneficial reuses

Funding

  1. Tsinghua University Graduate School in Shen Zhen, China
  2. Jackson State University, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The leaching concentrations of different metals in stainless steel pickling residue (SSPR) were determined and the toxic metals were treated using Na2S center dot xH(2)O, FeSO4 center dot 6H(2)O, and phosphoric acid. A modified European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) sequential extraction was used to identify the speciation of the concerned metals. Results showed that SSPR contains a large amount of Ca (58.41%), Fe (29.44%), Cr (3.83%), Ni (2.94%), Mn (2.82%) and some of Al, Cu, Mg, Zn. Among them, Cr and Ni were the most toxic metals in SSPR, thus the raw SSPR falls into hazardous waste category due to the leaching amount of Cr. In addition, the leached Cr was identified as Cr6+ (MgCrO4) in the waste. BCR test revealed that risk assessment code (RAC) of Cr and Ni were 33.29% and 61.7%, indicating they posed high and very high risk to the environment, respectively. After fixing by Na2S center dot xH(2)O and FeSO4 center dot 6H(2)O, the leaching concentrations of Cr and Ni were less than 1.5 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. After fixing by Na2S center dot xH(2)O and FeSO4 center dot 6H(2)O the treated SSPR can be safely reused as roadbed materials, concrete and cement aggregates. This study provides a useful implication in treatment and beneficial reuse of heavy metal-containing hazardous wastes. (C) 2020 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available