Journal
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 247-255Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jeq2.20003
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Wilfrid Laurier University
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, especially methane (CH4), from manure storage facilities can be substantial. Methane production requires adapted microbial communities (inoculum) to be present in the manure. Complete removal of liquid dairy manure (thus removing all inoculum) from storage tanks in the spring has been shown to significantly reduce CH4 emissions over the following warm season. This study examined whether the same mitigation effect would occur after fall removal of liquid dairy manure. Emissions of CH4, nitrous oxide (N2O), ammonia (NH3), and CO2 were measured from six 11.88-m(3) tanks equipped with flow-through chambers. There were three inoculated controls (20% inoculum) and three uninoculated treatments, where inoculum was completely removed in the fall/winter (0% inoculum). Direct N2O and NH3 (indirect N2O) were minor contributors to the total GHG budget, contributing <2% on a CO2 equivalent (CO(2)e) basis. Removal of inoculum led to a 34% decrease in total emissions on a CO(2)e basis and to a 29% decrease in the CH4 conversion factor compared with the inoculated control (0.37 vs. 0.52; p = .01). Overall, removing inoculum in the fall reduced CH4 emissions from manure storage tanks; however, fall inoculum removal was less effective than in a previous study where inoculum was removed in the spring. The timing of inoculum removal may affect the efficiency of this CH4 mitigation strategy. However, this method may be impractical for larger manure storage tanks. Further study is required to overcome challenges of time-sensitive, complete inoculum removal from farm-scale storage tanks.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available