4.7 Review

Remediation of persistent organic pollutants in aqueous systems by electrochemical activation of persulfates: A review

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 260, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110125

Keywords

Electrochemical activation; Persulfates; Environmental remediation; Mechanisms; Influencing factors; Practical application

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51709103]
  2. Training Program for Excellent Young Innovators of Changsha [kq1802020]
  3. Double First-Class Construction Project of Hunan Agricultural University [kxk201801005, SYL201802005]
  4. Hong Kong Scholars Program [XJ2018029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sulfate-radical-based advanced oxidation processes (SR-AOPs) have been widely applied in environmental remediation during the past decade, especially in the degradation of refractory organic contaminants. The electrochemical method, which is considered as one of the most efficient ways to generate sulfate radical, has been extensively investigated for the activation of persulfate recently. This work presented a thorough assessment towards the performance of electrochemically activated persulfate for the removal of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in aqueous systems. The mechanism and superiority of electrochemically activated persulfates were revealed accordingly. Some major factors (e.g., electrode material, pH, current density, and persulfate concentration) influencing the electrochemical activation of persulfates to remove POPs were also discussed. Considering the increasing quantity of publications on this subject, it is significant to broader guidelines such as the efficiency for practical application, quantization of organic by-products, and cost-effectiveness of the electrochemical method to optimize active persulfate in the water treatment processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available