4.4 Article

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Stone Type Assessment: A Pilot Study of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography with Five Indices

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 9, Pages 893-899

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0243

Keywords

urolithiasis; dual-energy CT; stone composition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose:To assess the efficacy of dual-energy CT (DECT) in predicting the composition of urinary stones with a single index (dual energy ratio [DER]) and five indices. Methods:Patients undergoing DECT before active urolithiasis treatment were prospectively enrolled in the study. Predictions of stone composition were made based on discriminant analysis with a single index (DER) and five indices (stone density at 80 and 135 kV, Zeff [the effective atomic number of the absorbent material] of the stone, DER, dual-energy index [DEI] and dual-energy difference [DED]). After extraction, stone composition was evaluated by means of physicochemical analyses (X-ray phase analysis, electron microscopy, wet chemistry techniques, and infrared spectroscopy). Results:A total of 91 patients were included. For calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones, the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of DECT with one index (DER) were 83.3%, 89.8%, and 86.8%, respectively; for calcium oxalate dihydrate (COD) and calcium phosphate stones-88.2%, 92.9%, and 91.2%, respectively; for uric acid stones-0%, 98.8% and 97.8%, respectively; for struvite stones-60%, 95.3%, and 93.4%, respectively. Discriminant analysis with five indices yielded the following sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy: 95.2%, 89.8%, and 92.3% for COM stones, 85.3%, 96.4%, and 92.3% for COD stones, and 100% in all three categories for both uric acid and struvite stones. Conclusions:DECT is a promising tool for stone composition assessment. It allowed for evaluation of chemical composition of all stone types with specificity and accuracy ranging from 85% to 100%. Five DECT indices have shown much better diagnostic accuracy compared to a single DECT index.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available