4.7 Article

Deep unsupervised learning of turbulence for inflow generation at various Reynolds numbers

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
Volume 406, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109216

Keywords

Inflow generation; Synthetic generation method; Deep learning; Unsupervised learning; Generative adversarial networks; Recurrent neural networks

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [2017R1E1A1A03070282]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1E1A1A03070282, 10Z20130011098] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A realistic inflow boundary condition is essential for successful simulation of the developing turbulent boundary layer or channel flows. In the present work, we applied generative adversarial networks (GANs), a representative of unsupervised learning, to generate an inlet boundary condition of turbulent channel flow. Upon learning the two-dimensional spatial structure of turbulence using data obtained from direct numerical simulation (DNS) of turbulent channel flow, the GAN could generate instantaneous flow fields that are statistically similar to those of DNS. After learning data at only three Reynolds numbers, the GAN could produce fields at various Reynolds numbers within a certain range without additional simulation. Eventually, through a combination of the GAN and a recurrent neural network (RNN), we developed a novel model (RNN-GAN) that could generate time-varying fully developed flow for a long time. The spatiotemporal correlations of the generated flow are in good agreement with those of the DNS. This proves the usefulness of unsupervised learning in the generation of synthetic turbulence fields. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available