4.4 Review

Electro-thermal and mechanical performance of multi-wall carbon nanotubes buckypapers embedded in fibre reinforced polymer composites for ice protection applications

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS
Volume 54, Issue 23, Pages 3457-3469

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0021998320915639

Keywords

Multi-wall carbon nanotubes; buckypaper; electrical resistance; self-heating composite; de-icing

Funding

  1. INNOVATIVE doctoral programme
  2. Marie Curie Initial Training Networks (ITN) action [665468]
  3. Institute for Aerospace Technology (IAT) at the University of Nottingham

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several ice protection strategies have been developed to overcome the icing hazards in the aerospace industry. The electro-thermal method is one of the popular approaches to prevent ice accretion and accumulation on aircraft surfaces. Given the increasing requirement of composites on aircraft structures, metal frameworks/fibre-reinforced composites have been developed as a de-icing solution for the new generation aircraft. The present work aimed to fabricate self-heating multi-wall carbon nanotubes based composites for ice protection and to study their electro-thermal and mechanical characteristics. Carbon nanotube buckypapers (CNPs) were prepared and embedded in fibre reinforced polymer composites by two methods: pre-preg and resin impregnation. The influence of the carbon nanotube network structure on the mechanical properties and electrical characteristics of the composites was evaluated. Mechanical tests, three-point flexural test and interlaminar shear strength test demonstrated improved mechanical characteristics of the CNP based composites. De-icing performance of the composites was conducted through a heating test in a climate chamber at -20celcius. The results indicated that the CNP-based composite is a promising self-heating material candidate for ice protection systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available