4.6 Article

Oral health and gastrointestinal cancer: A nationwide cohort study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 7, Pages 796-808

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13304

Keywords

gastrointestinal cancer; oral hygiene; periodontal disease

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education [2018R1D1A1B07040959]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims Poor oral hygiene is closely associated with bacteraemia and systemic inflammation, which are known mediators of cancer development. We investigated the relationship between oral hygiene indicators and the risk of gastrointestinal cancer in a nationwide population-based cohort. Materials and Methods This study was conducted on data from 150,774 subjects from the Korean National Health Screening Cohort. The occurrence of gastrointestinal cancer was analysed according to the presence of periodontal disease and oral hygiene indicators: frequency of toothbrushing, dental visits for any reason, professional dental cleanings and number of missing teeth. Gastrointestinal cancer was defined using International Statistical Classification of Diseases-10 codes C15-C26. Results During a median 11.6 years of follow-up, the estimated 10-year event rate for gastrointestinal cancer was 6.76%. In a multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, sex, income level, regular exercise, alcohol consumption, smoking status, body mass index, history of comorbidities, systolic blood pressure and laboratory findings, frequent toothbrushing (>= 3/day) was significantly associated with a reduced risk for gastrointestinal cancer (hazard ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval (0.86-0.96), p < .001, p for trend < .001). Conclusions Good oral hygiene behaviour, especially frequent toothbrushing, could be associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available