4.7 Article

Dry batch anaerobic digestion of food waste in a box-type reactor system: Inoculum preparation and reactor performance

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 251, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119751

Keywords

Biogas; Food waste; Garage digester; Liquid inoculum; Percolate recirculation; Waste to energy

Funding

  1. University of Cantabria
  2. Society for the Regional Development of Cantabria (SODERCAN)
  3. FEDER Operational Programme for Cantabria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A box-type reactor system with liquid inoculum has been studied for the dry anaerobic digestion of food waste. The food waste was processed without any pre-treatment to remove physical impurities, neither water addition to dilute and slurry the feedstock. The experiment was carried out with inoculum to substrate ratios of 1:1 (w/w) and 0.08:1 (VS basis). Previous acclimation of liquid inoculum enhanced the process, assuring a fast start up of the box digester and preventing from process failure by volatile fatty acids accumulation. The percolate recirculation strategy was shown to have a relevant effect on the progress of the process. The results suggest that the process can be optimized by providing low percolate recirculation rate during the start-up of the box digester followed by an increase in the percolate recirculation rate when volatile fatty acids decrease and methane content in the biogas increases. The methane yield obtained in the box digester from the food waste was in the range 460-477 L CH4 kg(-1) VS, being the VS removal efficiency between 91.1 and 91.4%. Globally, the process operated at an organic loading rate of 2.5 kg VS m(-3) d(-1) and yielded a volumetric methane production rate of 1.0 m(3) CH4 m(3) d(-1). These results show the high potential of food waste for its conversion in renewable energy by using the dry batch anaerobic technology. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available