4.7 Article

Catalytic Site pKa Values of Aspartic, Cysteine, and Serine Proteases: Constant pH MD Simulations

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages 3030-3042

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00190

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P30737, P30565]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enzymatic function and activity of proteases is closely controlled by the pH value. The protonation states of titratable residues in the active site react to changes in the pH value, according to their pK(a), and thereby determine the functionality of the enzyme. Knowledge of the titration behavior of these residues is crucial for the development of drugs targeting the active site residues. However, experimental pK(a) data are scarce, since the systems' size and complexity make determination of these pK(a) values inherently difficult. In this study, we use single pH constant pH MD simulations as a fast and robust tool to estimate the active site pK(a) values of a set of aspartic, cysteine, and serine proteases. We capture characteristic pK(a) shifts of the active site residues, which dictate the experimentally determined activity profiles of the respective protease family. We find clear differences of active site pK(a) values within the respective families, which closely match the experimentally determined pH preferences of the respective proteases. These shifts are caused by a distinct network of electrostatic interactions characteristic for each protease family. While we find convincing agreement with experimental data for serine and aspartic proteases, we observe clear deficiencies in the description of the titration behavior of cysteines within the constant pH MD framework and highlight opportunities for improvement. Consequently, with this work, we provide a concise set of active site pK(a) values of aspartic and serine proteases, which could serve as reference for future theoretical as well as experimental studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available