4.6 Article

Hypoxia induces de novo formation of cerebral collaterals and lessens the severity of ischemic stroke

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 40, Issue 9, Pages 1806-1822

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X20924107

Keywords

Collateral circulation; cerebral circulation; ischemic stroke; hypoxia; angiogenesis

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke [NS083633]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pial collaterals provide protection in stroke. Evidence suggests their formation late during gestation (collaterogenesis) is driven by reduced oxygen levels in the cerebral watersheds. The purpose of this study was to determine if collaterogenesis can be re-activated in the adult to induce formation of additional collaterals (neo-collateral formation, NCF). Mice were gradually acclimated to reduced inspired oxygen (FIO2) and maintained at 12, 10, 8.5 or 7% for two-to-eight weeks. Hypoxemia induced dose-dependent NCF and remodeling of native collaterals, and decreased infarct volume after permanent MCA occlusion. In contrast, no formation occurred of addition collateral-like intra-tree anastomoses, PComs, or branches within the MCA tree. Hypoxic NCF, remodeling and infarct protection were durable, i.e. retained for at least six weeks after return to normoxia. Hypoxia increased expression of Hif2 alpha, Vegfa, Rabep2, Angpt2, Tie2 and Cxcr4. Neo-collateral formation was abolished in mice lacking Rabep2, a novel gene involved in VEGFA -> Flk1 signaling and required for formation of collaterals during development, and inhibited by knockdown of Vegfa, Flk1 and Cxcr4. Rabep2-dependent NCF was also induced by permanent MCA occlusion. This is the first report that hypoxia induces new pial collaterals to form. Hypoxia- and occlusion-induced neo-collateral formation provide models to study collaterogenesis in the adult.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available