4.3 Review

Mechanism of Creaming Down Based on Chemical Characterization of a Complex of Caffeine and Tea Catechins

Journal

CHEMICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
Volume 64, Issue 7, Pages 676-686

Publisher

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/cpb.c16-00131

Keywords

creaming down; (-)-epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate; (-)-epicatechin-3-O-gallate; (-)-epicatechin; caffeine; X-ray crystallographic analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The component of a precipitate resulting from creaming down, which was made from caffeine and a catechin mixture, was determined by an integrated value of 112 proton signals of tea catechins in the quantitative H-1-NMR spectrum. The results showed that gallate-type catechins formed a precipitate by creaming down more predominantly than non-gallate-type catechins. X-ray crystallographic analysis showed that the gallate-type catechin (-)-epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate (EGCg), (-)-epicatechin-3-O-gallate (ECg) formed 2:2 and 2:4 complexes with caffeine, respectively, and the non-gallate-type catechin (-)-epicatechin (EC) and caffeine formed a 1 : 1 complex. The 2:2, 2:4 complexes of caffeine and EGCg, ECg formed a hydrophobic space with three aromatic A, B, and B' rings of two EGCg, ECg molecules, and one caffeine molecule was captured in this hydrophobic space. However, no such hydrophobic space in the 1:1 complex of caffeine and EC formed. It was thought that the hydrophobicity of the 2:2, 2:4 complexes of caffeine and EGCg, ECg was stronger than that of the 1:1 complex of caffeine and EC, with the result that the 2 : 2, 2:4 complexes of caffeine and EGCg, ECg precipitated by creaming down more predominantly than the 1:1 complex of caffeine and EC in an aqueous solution. Furthermore, the molecular capture of various heterocyclic compounds by formation of the 2:2 complex of EGCg from the aqueous solution was investigated using the quantitative 1H-NMR spectrum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available