4.6 Review

Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Where Do We Stand Today? A 5-Year Update

Journal

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
Volume 102, Issue 12, Pages 1084-1099

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01271

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the U.S. National Institutes of Health [R34-AR073505-01A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

& x27a2; Clinicians should exercise a high level of suspicion in at-risk patients (those who use corticosteroids, consume excessive alcohol, have sickle cell disease, etc.) in order to diagnose osteonecrosis of the femoral head in its earliest stage. & x27a2; Nonoperative treatment modalities have generally been ineffective at halting progression. Thus, nonoperative treatment is not appropriate in early stages when one is attempting to preserve the native joint, except potentially on rare occasions for small-sized, medially located lesions, which may heal without surgery. & x27a2; Joint-preserving procedures should be attempted in early-stage lesions to save the femoral head. & x27a2; Cell-based augmentation of joint-preserving procedures continues to show promising results, and thus should be considered as an ancillary treatment method that may improve clinical outcomes. & x27a2; The outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in the setting of osteonecrosis are excellent, with results similar to those in patients who have an underlying diagnosis of osteoarthritis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available