4.6 Article

Automated and rapid identification of multidrug resistant Escherichia coli against the lead drugs of acylureidopenicillins, cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones using specific Raman marker bands

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOPHOTONICS
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.202000149

Keywords

antibiotic susceptibility testing; Escherichia coli; multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria; Raman spectroscopy; weighted sum score

Funding

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [FKZ 01EO1502, FKZ 13GW0096F]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [CRC 1278, FKZ: PO 633/29-1, FKZ: BA 1601/10-1]
  3. European Commission [BM1401]
  4. Leibniz-Gemeinschaft (Leibniz ScienceCampus InfectoOptics) [W8/2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A Raman-based, strain-independent, semi-automated method is presented that allows the rapid (<3 hours) determination of antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial pathogens isolated from clinical samples. Applyinga prioriknowledge about the mode of action of the respective antibiotic, we identified characteristic Raman marker bands in the spectrum and calculated batch-wise weighted sum scores from standardized Raman intensity differences between spectra of antibiotic exposed and nonexposed samples of the same strains. The lead substances for three relevant antibiotic classes (fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin, third-generation cephalosporin cefotaxime, ureidopenicillin piperacillin) against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MRGN) revealed a high sensitivity and specificity for the susceptibility testing of twoEscherichia colilaboratory strains and 12 clinical isolates. The method benefits from the parallel incubation of control and treated samples, which reduces the variance due to alterations in cultivation conditions and the standardization of differences between batches leading to long-term comparability of Raman measurements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available