4.7 Article

Novel guanosine derivatives against MERS CoV polymerase: An in silico perspective

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS
Volume 39, Issue 8, Pages 2923-2931

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1758789

Keywords

MERS CoV; polymerase; molecular dynamics simulation; molecular docking; HCV NS5b RdRp

Funding

  1. [pro15b114s1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MERS CoV is a new viral infection with high mortality rate and shares similarity with Hepatitis C Virus RNA dependent RNA polymerase. The study suggests using anti-polymerases as potential candidates against MERS CoV RdRp, and identifies four novel compounds as high performance inhibitors.
The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS CoV), also termed camel flu, is a new viral infection that first reported in the year 2012 in the Middle East region and further spread during the last seven years. MERS CoV is characterized by its high mortality rate among different human coronaviruses. MERS CoV polymerase shares more than 20% sequence identity with the Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Non-structural 5b (NS5b) RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). Despite the low sequence identity, the active site is conserved between the two proteins, with two consecutive aspartates that are crucial in the nucleotide transfer reaction. In this study, seven nucleotide inhibitors have been tested against MERS CoV RdRp using molecular modeling and docking simulations, from which four are novel compounds. Molecular Dynamics Simulation for 260 nanoseconds is performed on the MERS CoV RdRp model to test the effect of protein dynamics on the binding affinities to the tested nucleotide inhibitors. Results support the hypothesis of using the anti-polymerases (Anti-HCV drugs) against MERS CoV RdRp as a potent candidates. Besides four novel compounds are suggested as a seed for high performance inhibitors against MERS CoV RdRp. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available