4.6 Article

The relationship between the three-dimensional structure of porous GaN distributed Bragg reflectors and their birefringence

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 127, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0005770

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Consul (EPSRC) [EP/L015455/1, EP/L015978/1]
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/M010589/1]
  3. EPSRC Impact Acceleration Account Follow On Fund of the University of Cambridge
  4. EPSRC [EP/M011682/1, EP/M010589/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Porous GaN distributed Bragg reflectors offer an opportunity to provide the high reflectance, lattice-matched components required for efficient GaN vertical cavity surface emitting lasers. The birefringence of these structures is, therefore, of key interest as it could be used to control the polarization of the emitted light. Here, we present a detailed analysis of the optical birefringence for both laterally etched, patterned structures and self-assembled radial porous structures. We correlate this with the 3D structure of the pores, which we measure through the use of FIB milling and serial block-face SEM imaging. This is a powerful method for imaging the internal nanostructure of the sample and allows the internal pore morphology to be viewed in a reconstruction of any 3D plane. We measure the birefringence of our porous GaN layers as Delta n = 0.14 with a lower refractive index parallel to the pores (parallel to) than perpendicular to them (). Using finite element modeling, we accurately reproduce the experimentally observed birefringence trends and find that this can be done by modeling GaN as a perfect dielectric. This indicates that the birefringence arises from the limited width across the pores. This also shows that standard modeling approaches can be used to design porous GaN birefringent devices effectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available