4.7 Article

Investigation of mechanical and frictional performance for bismaleimide composites reinforced by hyperbranched polysiloxane-cyclophosphazene functionalized rGO/MoS2

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 823, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153837

Keywords

Hyperbranched polysiloxane; Graphene-like MoS2; Mechanical performance; Frictional behavior

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21875188]
  2. Innovation Foundation for Doctor Dissertation of Northwestern Polytechnical University [CX201820]
  3. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2018JM2024]
  4. Shaanxi Key Research and Development Plan [2019ZDLGY04-08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, graphene/MoS2 nanosheets (rGO/MoS2) functionalized by a novel hyperbranched polysiloxane (HBPSi) containing cyclophosphazene (HBPSi-CPP) were synthesized by a precipitation polymerization approach. We doped different loading amounts of HBPSi-CPP@rGO/MoS2 as solid lubricating filler into bismaleimide (BMI) resin to produce HBPSi-CPP@rGO/MoS2/BMI hybrid composite materials. The morphology and structure of HBPSi-CPP@rGO/MoS2 as well as the mechanical and tribological properties of BMI composites were systematically investigated. The results exhibited that 0.8 wt% BMI system got the peak values of the bending and impact strengths (187.8 MPa and 22.4 kJ/m(2)), which are the highest values of rGO-based materials for BMI matrix in open literatures. Moreover, for 0.4 wt% BMI sample, its average frictional coefficient and abrasion rate get the minimum values of 0.26 and 1.6 x 10(-6) mm(3)/(N.m), separately. This is attributed to the good dispersibility and self-lubrication of HBPSi-CPP@rGO/MoS2 as well as the improved inorganic-organic compatibility between HBPSi-CPP@rGO/MoS2 nanomaterial and BMI resin. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available