4.7 Article

Antidepressants and suicidality: A re-analysis of the re-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 266, Issue -, Pages 95-99

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.107

Keywords

Antidepressants; Suicide; Suicide attempts; Suicide risk; Meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Charite Clinician-Scientist Program of the Berlin Institute of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A recent study by Hengartner and Ploderl describes a strong increase for suicides (odds ratio (OR) of 2.83, 95% CI =1.13-9.67) and suicide attempts (OR = 2.38 95%, CI =1.63-3.61) in antidepressant treated patients as compared to placebo. The authors re-analyzed data presented by Khan et al. who found no drugplacebo differences in suicide and suicide attempt rates. Hengartner and Ploderl base their findings on calculating the OR from a 2 x 2 table of the sum of the events and the totals of the sample sizes across studies. We here argue that pooling data from all drugs may not be the adequate approach. Methods: We applied a meta-analytical approach to account for between-drug variance and conducted several statistical analyses as a sensitivity analysis. We argue that a more suitable approach for finding an overall effect from several observations is a meta-analytical approach namely the Mantel-Haenszel method without continuity correction. Results: Our analysis leads to different conclusions as opposed to Hengartner and Ploderl. With the recommended method we estimate an OR of 1.98, 95% CI 0.71-5.50 for suicides and 1.63 (95%CI = 1.09-2.43) for suicide attempts. Limitations: The conducted analysis was restricted to the data available from the previous studies. Possibly, a more extensive search of the literature would lead to different results. However, we showed that re-analysing the re-analysis with several different approaches underlines the necessity of sensitivity analysis. Conclusion: We could show that, in the case of rare events, the data is very sensitive to different analytical approaches underlining the importance of further investigations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available