4.4 Article

Revisiting the generalized pseudospectral method: Radial expectation values, fine structure, and hyperfine splitting of confined atom

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY
Volume 120, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/qua.26245

Keywords

confined atom; fine structure; generalized pseudospectral method; hyperfine splitting; radial expectation value

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper revisits the generalized pseudospectral (GPS) method on the calculation of various radial expectation values of atomic systems, especially on the spatially confined hydrogen atom and harmonic oscillator. As one of the collocation methods based on global functions, the powerfulness and robustness of the GPS method has been well established in solving the radial Schrodinger equation with high accuracy. However, in our recent work, it was found that the previous calculations based on the GPS method for the radial expectation values of confined systems show significant discrepancies with other theoretical methods. In this work we have tackled such a problem by tracing its source to the GPS method and found that the method itself may not be able to obtain the system wave function at the origin. Combined with an extrapolation method developed here, the GPS method can fully reproduce the radial quantities obtained by other theoretical methods, but with more flexibility, efficiency, and accuracy. We apply the GPS-extrapolation method to investigate the relatievistic fine structure and hyperfine splitting of confined hydrogen atom in s-wave states where the zero-point wave function dominates. Good agreement with previous predictions is obtained for confined hydrogen in low-lying states, and benchmark results are obtained for high-lying excited states. The perturbation treatment of the fine and hyperfine interactions is validated in the confining environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available