4.6 Article

Piloting an evidence-based intervention for HIV prevention among street youth in Eldoret, Kenya

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 433-443

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.1007/s00038-020-01349-8

Keywords

HIV; Condom use; Evidence-based intervention; Street youth; Kenya; Eldoret; Sexual practices

Funding

  1. International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Ottawa, Canada [108279-16]
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R01HD060478]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives This study presents findings from piloting an adapted evidence-based intervention, Stepping Stones and Creating Futures, to change street-connected young people's HIV knowledge, condom-use self-efficacy, and sexual practices. Methods Eighty street-connected young people participated in a pre- and post-test mixed methods design in Eldoret, Kenya. The primary outcome of interest was HIV knowledge. Secondary outcomes included condom-use self-efficacy and sexual practices. Multiple linear regression models for change scores with adjustment for socio-demographic variables were fitted. Qualitative and quantitative findings are presented together, where integration confirms, expands on, or uncovers discordant findings. Results Participants had a significant increase in HIV knowledge from pre- to post-intervention. The median HIV knowledge score pre-intervention was 11 (IQR 8-13) and post-intervention 14 (IQR 12-16). Attendance was significantly associated with HIV knowledge change scores. Qualitatively participants reported increased HIV and condom-use knowledge and improved condom-use self-efficacy and health-seeking practices. Conclusions Our findings support the potential for further testing with a rigorous study design to investigate how best to tailor the intervention, particularly by gender, and increase the overall effectiveness of the program.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available