4.4 Article

Observations on Vegetative Branching in Cycads

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES
Volume 181, Issue 6, Pages 564-580

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/708812

Keywords

adventitious; branching; cycads; isotomy

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [7721495, 7921130, BSR-8607049, EF-0629817, IOS-0421604, DBI-0822201]
  2. Division Of Environmental Biology
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [7721495] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Premise of research. Branching in cycads has received little attention, in part because of a lack of available materials for developmental study. Morphology and mature anatomy have enabled some conclusions to be made, but more observations, which are the basis for the present study, are needed. Methodology. Observations concerning external morphology were made in habitat. Some plants were sectioned with a machete and were stained with phloroglucinol so that the internal organization of the primary and secondary xylem could be observed. Pivotal results. Vegetative branching occurs via two processes, isotomous branching of the shoot apex and adventitious branching from damaged regions and leaf bases. Conclusions. From external morphology and mature stem vasculature, apical branching is isotomous, with successive isotomies occurring at right angles. There are no axillary buds. False isotomies can occur from equal adventitious branches on decapitated trunks. These pseudoisotomies can be determined by disruptions in the leaf base pattern in the area of the trunk where the pseudoisotomies occur. Adventitious branching occurs via two pathways. First, in intact plants, branches arise from meristematic tissue produced by a phellogen in the leaf bases. Second, branches arise from lateral meristems (the vascular cambium and the phellogen) in damaged stems, as well as occasionally from the pith.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available