4.7 Article

Developing Computational Model to Predict Protein-Protein Interaction Sites Based on the XGBoost Algorithm

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21072274

Keywords

protein interaction sites; unbalanced data sets; overlapping regions; XGBoost

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61472282, 61672035, 61872004]
  2. Educational Commission of Anhui Province [KJ2019ZD05]
  3. Open Fund from Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Emission Reduction & Resources Recycling [KF2017-02]
  4. Co-Innovation Center for Information Supply & Assurance Technology in AHU [ADXXBZ201705]
  5. Anhui Scientific Research Foundation for Returnees

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study of protein-protein interaction is of great biological significance, and the prediction of protein-protein interaction sites can promote the understanding of cell biological activity and will be helpful for drug development. However, uneven distribution between interaction and non-interaction sites is common because only a small number of protein interactions have been confirmed by experimental techniques, which greatly affects the predictive capability of computational methods. In this work, two imbalanced data processing strategies based on XGBoost algorithm were proposed to re-balance the original dataset from inherent relationship between positive and negative samples for the prediction of protein-protein interaction sites. Herein, a feature extraction method was applied to represent the protein interaction sites based on evolutionary conservatism of proteins, and the influence of overlapping regions of positive and negative samples was considered in prediction performance. Our method showed good prediction performance, such as prediction accuracy of 0.807 and MCC of 0.614, on an original dataset with 10,455 surface residues but only 2297 interface residues. Experimental results demonstrated the effectiveness of our XGBoost-based method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available