Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages -Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2123
Keywords
lung cancer; meta-analysis; robotic surgery; thoracoscopic surgery; thoracotomy
Categories
Funding
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [22120180510]
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [81972172]
- Shanghai Education Development Foundation [17SG23]
- Shanghai Municipal Health Commission [2017BR026]
- Shanghai Municipal Human Resources and Social Securitiy Bureau [2017114]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background The superiority of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) over video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy remains controversial for lung cancer. Methods A network meta-analysis (NMA) and pairwise meta-analysis (PMA) were performed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes using five databases. Results Thirty-two studies involving 6593 patients were included for analysis. The NMA showed that RATS had similar operative time, conversion rate to thoracotomy, number of lymph node, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay with VATS, except for lower 30-day mortality. Compared with thoracotomy, longer operative time and shorter hospital stay were observed in RATS, but no significant difference was observed in number of lymph node, postoperative morbidity, and 30-day mortality in both NMA and PMA. In lobectomy/segmentectomy subgroup, all outcomes, except for operative time of RATS vs VATS and number of lymph node, were similar with overall analyses. Conclusions RATS had comparable perioperative outcomes with VATS and open surgery.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available