4.7 Article

Evaluation of Pt, Rh, SnO2, (NH4)2Mo3S13, BaSO4 protection coatings on WSe2 photocathodes for solar hydrogen evolution

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 45, Issue 38, Pages 19112-19120

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.251

Keywords

WSe2; BaSO4; thin films; photocathode; photocorrosion; stability

Funding

  1. ORAU project, NU, Kazakhstan: Investigation of high-intensity pulsed ion beam neutralization by volumetric plasma [SSH2020014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The stability of photoelectrodes is of prime importance, which determines the long-term efficiency of solar to hydrogen conversion. To this respect, the performances of Pt, Rh, SnO2, (NH4)(2)Mo3S13 (ATM), BaSO4 are compared as protection coatings for WSe2 photocathodes. It is found that Pt and Rh catalysts, selectively photo-deposited at the active edges of WSe2 crystallites, are not able to sustain the maximum photocurrent densities for hydrogen evolution reaction due to surface oxidation. By comparison, the ATM layer effectively passivates the van der Waals planes of WSe2 , however, it is oxidized with further amorphization, thus decreasing the photocurrent density by 82% after 3 h 10 min of PEC testing. The SnO2 layer on top of ATM/WSe2 stabilizes the photocurrent to some extent, but limits the maximum photocurrent density. Solution deposition of BaSO 4 onto ATM/WSe2 photocathodes did not compromise the photocurrent density and resulted in significant improvement of the PEC stability. Herein, the photocurrent density is decreased by 44% after 3 h 10 min of testing, which is rather less than that of bare ATM/WSe2. The chemical states of all photocathodes are assessed by XPS analysis, before and after PEC testing, which identified that the BaSO4 suppresses photo-corrosion of the ATM. (C) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available