4.7 Article

Methane dry reforming using oil palm shell activated carbon supported cobalt catalyst: Multi-response optimization

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 46, Issue 48, Pages 24754-24767

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.188

Keywords

Oil palm shell; Activated carbon; Cobalt catalyst; Methane dry reforming; Multi-response optimization

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) , Malaysia through the Fundamental Research Grant SchemeMalaysia Research Star Award (FRGSMRSA) [4F988]
  2. Universiti Malaysia Pahang (UMP) internal grant [RDU1903132]
  3. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dry reforming of methane with carbon dioxide was investigated using oil palm shell activated carbon supported cobalt catalyst. The study found that reaction temperature was the most influential variable, and both H-2 and CO yields could be optimized simultaneously.
Dry reforming of methane with carbon dioxide was investigated using oil palm shell activated carbon (OPS-AC) supported cobalt catalyst. The cobalt loaded OPS-AC catalysts were prepared by wet-impregnation method and characterized using SEM, FESEM, BET, TPR and TPD. Surface morphology of OPS-AC supported cobalt catalysts exhibited higher porosity, surface area and micropore volume with different densities of cobalt particles and support. Furthermore, greater amount of H-2 chemisorbed and acidity were observed with increasing cobalt contents. Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to design the experiments based on factorial central composite design. Catalytic testing was performed using a micro reactor system by varying four variables: temperature, gauge pressure, CH4/CO2 ratio and gas hourly specific velocity (GHSV). H-2 and CO yields were analyzed and quantified by gas chromatography with thermal conductivity detector (TCD). Both responses (H-2 and CO) yields were optimized simultaneously using desirability function analysis. Reaction temperature was the most influential variable with high desirability prevalent for both responses. The optimum response values of H-2 and CO yields corresponded to 903 degrees C, 0.88 bar(g), CH4/CO2 = 1.31 and GHSV = 4,488 mL/h.g-catalyst. (C) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available