4.4 Article

Combined Cerebellar Proton MR Spectroscopy and DWI Study of Patients with Friedreich's Ataxia

Journal

CEREBELLUM
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 82-88

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-016-0767-z

Keywords

Proton MRS; DWI; FRDA

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA) is the commonest autosomal recessive ataxia, caused by GAA triplet expansion in the frataxin gene. Neuropathological studies in FRDA demonstrate that besides the primary neurodegeneration of the dorsal root ganglia, there is a progressive atrophy of the cerebellar dentate nucleus. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) detected microstructural alterations in the cerebellum of FRDA patients. To investigate the biochemical basis of these alterations, we used both DWI and proton MR spectroscopy (H-1-MRS) to study the same cerebellar volume of interest (VOI) including the dentate nucleus. DWI and H-1-MRS study of the left cerebellar hemisphere was performed in 28 genetically proven FRDA patients and 35 healthy controls. In FRDA mean diffusivity (MD) values were calculated for the same H-1-MRS VOI. Clinical severity was evaluated using the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). FRDA patients showed a significant reduction of N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), a neuroaxonal marker, and choline (Cho), a membrane marker, both expressed relatively to creatine (Cr), and increased MD values. In FRDA patients NAA/Cr negatively correlated with MD values (r = -0.396, p = 0.037) and with ICARS score (r = -0.669, p < 0.001). Age-normalized NAA/Cr loss correlated with the GAA expansion (r = -0.492, p = 0.008). The reduced cerebellar NAA/Cr in FRDA suggests that neuroaxonal loss is related to the microstructural changes determining higher MD values. The correlation between NAA/Cr and the severity of disability suggests that this biochemical in vivo MR parameter might be a useful biomarker to evaluate therapeutic interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available