4.3 Article

Role of land use and land cover in residential exposures to agricultural pesticide models

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09603123.2020.1759029

Keywords

Pesticide drift; residential exposure; rural population; mitigation; remote sensing

Funding

  1. CNES (French National Centre for Space Studies)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review analyzes the role of Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) in Residential Exposure to Agricultural Pesticides (REAP) and highlights the need for further research on LULC mitigation elements.
Exposure of the general population to pesticides, especially in agricultural areas, is a major public health concern. This review analyses the role of Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) in Residential Exposure to Agricultural Pesticides (REAP) and how it is measured and modelled. Some epidemiological studies have shown that basic LULC variables, such as distance to a crop and field size, are relevant for explaining REAP. However, the potential of LULC mitigation elements, such as vegetation barriers, grassy strips and buffer zones, to mitigate REAP has been poorly studied. The availability of recent low-cost and high-quality geospatial data enables REAP models to include alternative and more precise LULC variables. This review also highlights the need for (i) generic environmental sampling protocols, (ii) exposure and spraying datasets and (iii) assessment of the mitigation capacity of LULC to improve REAP modelling significantly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available