4.7 Review

Review of the experimental research on the thermal-hydraulic characteristics in the pebble bed nuclear reactor core and fusion breeder blankets

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 8, Pages 11352-11383

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.5378

Keywords

convective heat transfer; effective thermal conductivity; experimental investigations; flow characteristics; pebble-bed-type nuclear reactors

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M661513]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [11475132]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pebble-bed-type nuclear reactors have gained more attention recently due to their inherent safety characteristics and multiple applications. Experimental investigations on the thermal-hydraulics of different fluids in the reactor core have been reviewed, providing important insights for safety evaluation and design. Main factors influencing flow, convective heat transfer, and effective thermal conductivity in the pebble bed have been discussed.
Merits in the inherent safety characteristics and multiple applications, cause the pebble-bed-type nuclear reactors, including the High-Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors, Fluoride-salt-cooled High-temperature Reactors and Water-cooled Pebble-bed Reactors, to gain more focus in recent years. Thermal-hydraulic characteristics in the pebble bed reactor core are of great significance to the safety evaluation and design of such reactors. Experimental investigations on the thermal-hydraulics of different fluids in the pebble-bed-type of nuclear reactor core have been reviewed in this paper. Main experimental methods to determine the flow regime transition, convective heat transfer coefficients, and effective thermal conductivity have been summarized, with the merits and disadvantages discussed. Discussions are given on the main factors that can influence the flow, convective heat transfer and effective thermal conductivity in the pebble bed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available