4.3 Article

Atherosclerotic plaque detected by transesophageal echocardiography is an independent predictor for all-cause mortality

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 36, Issue 8, Pages 1437-1443

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-01840-6

Keywords

Transesophageal echocardiography; Aortic plaque; Survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atherosclerotic lesions in the great arteries are frequent findings in the elderly. Numerous studies have shown their strong predictive value for cardiovascular disease, embolic events, and mortality. We sought to determine the risk of all-cause mortality depending on the localization of plaques in the thoracic aorta evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). A total of 2,054 patients (median age 65 years, interquartile range 52-73; 58% men) who underwent a TEE examination between 01/2007 and 03/2015 were retrospectively analyzed. For each patient, the presence of atherosclerotic lesions in the ascending aorta, the aortic arch, and in the descending aorta, as well as cardiovascular risk factors and survival were documented. Median follow-up period was 48 months (interquartile range 38-58). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated plaque in the ascending aorta (HR of 1.36, 95% CI 1.01-1.83, P = 0.046), the aortic arch (HR of 1.78, 95% CI 1.29-2.45, P < 0.001), the descending aorta (HR of 2.01, 95% CI 1.54-2.77, P < 0.001), and plaque in any part of the thoracic aorta (HR of 1.84, 95% CI 1.42-2.4, P < 0.001), as independent predictors for all-cause mortality after adjusting for age, sex, arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and diabetes. In this study, we could demonstrate that more than mild plaque at any site of the thoracic aorta predicts all-cause mortality. Assessment of atherosclerotic lesions in all segments of the thoracic aorta should be part of every routine TEE examination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available