4.2 Article

Starch Debranching Enzyme Activity and Its Effects on Some Starch Physicochemical Characteristics in Developing Substituted and Complete Triticales (X Triticosecale Wittmack)

Journal

CEREAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 64-70

Publisher

AACC INTERNATIONAL
DOI: 10.1094/CCHEM-02-15-0034-R

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Council of Mexico (CONACYT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present work was carried out to make a comparison between the starch debranching enzyme activity and the synthesis of total carbohydrates, starch, amylose, and amylopectin in developing kernels of two sets of triticales differing in genome composition (complete and substituted triticales). The results showed that the carbohydrate and starch accumulation observed in both genotypes of triticales increased rapidly at the early stage, reaching the maximum at the medium stage and decreasing slightly or remaining relatively constant at the last stage of kernel development. At the end of the development stage, the mature grains of complete and substituted triticales accumulated 62.5 and 54.6% starch, respectively. Both sets of triticales showed the same amylose accumulation profile as well as degree of polymerization; however, at the maturity stage there was a small but significant difference between the two sets. The final polymerization values of amylose chains in mature seeds of complete and substituted triticales were DP 1,549 and 1,313. A and B1 amylopectin chains of the complete triticales were approximately 19 and 33% shorter than those of the substituted triticales. The complete triticales showed higher isoamylase and pullulanase activities than the substituted triticales, which coincided with the highest starch and amylose contents observed in kernels under development. The results of this study demonstrate that the synthesis of starch differs between the triticale genotypes used in the study, which influences their chemical structure and physicochemical properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available