4.7 Article

(Electrochemical) Properties and Computational Investigations of Ferrocenyl-substituted Fe3(μ3-PFc)2(CO)9 and Co4(μ4-PFc)2(CO)9 Clusters and Their Reduced Species

Journal

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 59, Issue 9, Pages 6147-6160

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00276

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Forrest Research Foundation
  2. Univ. of Western Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The formation of ferrocenyl-functionalized iron and cobalt carbonyl clusters is reported, based on a reaction of FcPCl(2) (3) (Fc = Fe(eta(5)-C5H5)(eta(5)-C5H4)) with Fe-2(CO)(9) and Co-2(CO)(8), respectively. Therein, nido-Fe-3(CO)(9)(mu(3)-PFc)(2) (4) and nido-Co-4(CO)(10)(mu(3)-PFc)(2) (5) clusters were obtained as the first diferrocenyl-substituted carbonyl clusters with a symmetrical cluster core. Cluster 4 shows two reversible one-electron processes within the anodic region, based on Fc/Fc(+) redox events, as well as two processes in the cathodic region. In situ IR and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements of all electronic states confirmed an Fc-based oxidation and a core-based reduction. On the basis of the results of a single-crystal X-ray analysis of structures of 4 and 5, computational studies of the highest occupied molecular orbital-lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energies, the spin density, quantum theory of atom-in-molecule delocalization indices, and the atomic charges were performed to explain the experimental results. The latter revealed a reorganization of the cluster core upon reduction and the existence of weak P...P interactions in 4 and 5. Ferrocenyl-related redox processes, occurring reversibly in case of 4, were absent for 5, due to a different distribution of the HOMO energies. EPR measurements furthermore confirmed the core-based radical anion and the formation of a decomposition product at potentials lower than [M](2- )(M = Fe, Co).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available