4.7 Article

Conflict analysis under one-vote veto based on approximate three-way concept lattice

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 516, Issue -, Pages 316-330

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.12.065

Keywords

Conflict analysis; One-vote veto; Three-way concept analysis; Approximate three-way concept

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61502150, 61772021, 11801440, 61976244]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2019JQ-816]
  3. Innovation Talent Promotion Plan of Shaanxi Province for Young Sci-Tech New Star [2017KJXX-60]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conflict analysis, which plays an important role in our society, has attracted more and more attentions. However, the existing conflict analysis models are not effective enough to evaluate the inconsistency degree of cliques that have more than two individuals. Besides, for each clique, its allied, conflict and neutral attributes have not been explicitly defined and thoroughly explored. Therefore, due to the lack of enough explicit clues, we cannot further formulate some strategies manipulating the conflict degrees of related cliques to realize the specific objectives. Last but not least, one-vote veto is seldom considered, although it plays a vital role in many fields, such as venture capital and United Nations Security Council resolutions. In order to solve these problems, we resort to three-way concept analysis and describe a clique by using the intent of a specific concept. On the basis of the obtained specific concepts, we derive the allied, conflict and neutral attributes of cliques, and further make decisions and explore the maximal coalitions and minimum conflict sets. Finally, in order to cater dynamic environment, we also describe an incremental algorithm for conflict analysis. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available