4.6 Article

Analysis of Some Electrolyte Models Including Their Ability to Predict the Activity Coefficients of Individual Ions

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 59, Issue 25, Pages 11790-11809

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c00980

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
  2. China Scholarship [201608320224]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [832460]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work presents a modeling study, with selected models, of the mean ionic activity coefficients of electrolytes in aqueous solutions, where predictions of the activity coefficients of individual ions (ACI) are also considered, as well as an analysis of the various contributions in the models. In this work, we consider one electrolyte equation of state (the electrolyte cubic-plus-association equation of state, e-CPA) and other approaches based on combinations of various versions of the Debye-Huckel (DH) or mean spherical approximation (MSA) and Born terms. The results obtained in this work for ACI and the analysis of terms are discussed in the context of other recent literature studies. The results with the various modeling approaches are not identical but all models show some qualitatively good behavior for the ACI, with the extended version of DH+Born model performing overall better. Moreover, this study shows that, while good results are obtained in many cases, several parameters like the ion radius, Born radius, and relative static permittivity have a significant effect on the results. Finally, in all approaches it appears that the ion-ion (DH or MSA) and ion-solvent (Born) terms have almost equally large opposing contributions to the activity coefficients, indicating that both are equally important. This conclusion is agreement with most literature studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available