4.7 Article

On-site identification of Sceaux porcelain and faience using a portable Raman instrument

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 42, Issue 13, Pages 14918-14927

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.132

Keywords

Pottery; Porcelain; Soft-paste; Hard-paste; Sceaux; Raman

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the 18th century many European manufactures tried to imitate Chinese, Vietnamese and Japanese porcelain. To address the lack of kaolin source they had to test new processes inspired from the fritware technology. Unfortunately, the Sceaux Factory production is poor documented: it was only vaguely reported that different technologies were used to produce soft-paste and hard-paste porcelain as well as different kinds of faiences, including an undocumented faience japonnee. In order to bring new information, a selection of 25 objects from the Departement du Patrimoine et des Collections de la Cite de la Ceramique, Sevres, France, attributed to the 18th century Sceaux Factory production, has been analyzed with a portable 532 nm Raman spectrometer in museum reserves. Identification of the crystalline phases of the body and glaze as well as pigments allows differentiating the different technologies. According to previous studies on porcelains produced by other factories in Paris area (Chantilly, Saint-Cloud, Mennecy, Vincennes/Sevres, etc.), wollastonite (beta CaSiO4) appears to be characteristic of soft-paste porcelain paste. Therefore, the absence of wollastonite peaks is consistent with a faience body and the concomitance with the presence of quartz peaks can correspond either to hard-paste porcelain or to faience. Cassiterite, wollastonite and quartz are identified as glaze opacifiers. Different olivine and pyrochlore compositions have been evidenced for blue and yellow pigments, respectively. This fact can be related to different pigment technologies (periods or Master). (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available