4.6 Article

Effect of Calcination Temperature on the Performance of the Ni@SiO2 Catalyst in Methane Dry Reforming

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 59, Issue 30, Pages 13370-13379

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01213

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation [BK20170526]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21703086, 51872128]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China from MOST of China [2017YFE0102700]
  4. Open Fund of Chemistry Department in Qingdao University of Science and Technology [QUSTHX201917]
  5. Senior Talents Start-Up Fund of Jiangsu University [16JDG062]
  6. Jiangsu Provincial Government Scholarship Program for overseas study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calcination plays an important role in obtaining high-performance catalysts for heterogeneous reactions. In this work, the effect of calcination temperature on the performance of the Ni@SiO2 catalyst in the methane dry reforming reaction was investigated. The calcination temperature from 823 to 1223 K led to different sizes of Ni nanoparticles and strengths of metal-support interactions in the catalysts, which consequently affected the performance of the reforming reaction. The highest performance was neither achieved over Ni@SiO2-T (T = 823 and 923 K) catalysts with small Ni sizes and weak metal-support interactions nor gained over Ni@SiO2-T (T = 1123 and 1223 K) catalysts with big Ni sizes and strong metal-support interactions, while it was obtained over the Ni@SiO2-1023 catalyst with intermediate Ni size and intermediate metal-support interactions. The volcanic relationship between the catalytic performance and catalyst calcination temperature was assigned to both the Ni size effect and metal-support interaction that their combination significantly influenced the performance of the methane dry reforming reaction. The combination strategy may provide a possible optimization approach for other heterogeneous catalytic reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available