4.8 Article

Evaluation of DC-Link Voltage Switching Ripple in Multiphase PWM Voltage Source Inverters

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 3478-3490

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2936429

Keywords

Capacitors; Inverters; Pulse width modulation; Switches; Support vector machines; Mathematical model; Capacitors; dc-ac power converters; pulsewidth modulation inverters; switching circuits

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a generalized approach toward the dc-link voltage switching ripple analysis in the two-level multiphase pulsewidth modulation (PWM) voltage source inverters with a balanced load. Since the voltage ripple is one of the crucial sizing criteria for a dc-link capacitor, a simple and practical equation for designing the dc-link capacitor, based on the maximum (peak-to-peak) value of the dc-link voltage ripple, has been proposed for the multiphase inverters. The amplitude of the dc-link voltage switching ripple is analytically derived as a function of operating conditions. The effect of the number of phases on the dc-link capacitor size is investigated as well. It is found that considering the same total output current, the dc-link capacitor size is reduced by increasing the number of phases up to seven. However, from the point of view of the dc-link capacitor size, there are no benefits of further increasing the number of phases. Reference is made to two commonly used modulation strategies-sinusoidal PWM and continuous symmetric centered PWM (i.e., space vector). The mathematical models are derived with an aim to provide the precise dc-link capacitor sizing and hence improve the power density of the whole system. The comparison of different phase numbers has been made. Proposed theoretical developments are verified by the simulation and experimental tests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available