4.8 Article

Chips Classification for Suppressing Transient Current Imbalance of Parallel-Connected Silicon Carbide MOSFETs

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 3963-3972

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2934739

Keywords

Classification; current imbalance; parallel-connection; sensitivity analysis; silicon carbide (SiC) MOSFET

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0905703]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018QN015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article addresses the influence of parameters spread on transient current distribution among parallel-connected silicon carbide (SiC) mosfets and proposes a chips classification method to suppress current imbalance. A comprehensive comparison of parameter spread between silicon (Si) and SiC mosfets is first presented. Then, a new classification criterion, referred to in this article as a distance coefficient of transfer curves (DCTC), is proposed to characterize device spread. In addition, the sensitivity analysis of transient current imbalance (TCI) to device spread is carried out. It is found that TCI increases almost linearly with increasing DCTC. Furthermore, a hierarchical cluster algorithm is developed to achieve an automated chips classification for multiple devices intended for paralleled application. This algorithm may as well facilitate the chip selection process for multiple-chip power module packaging. Moreover, the influence of operating temperature on classification is also discussed. It should be noted that chips classification needs to consider real application conditions and package parasitic. Finally, a test bench with a round layout is designed, to keep circuit layout asymmetry to a minimum, and used to experimentally verify the performance of the classification method. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed classification method for suppressing TCI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available