4.8 Article

Core Temperature Estimation for Self-Heating Automotive Lithium-Ion Batteries in Cold Climates

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 3366-3375

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2019.2960833

Keywords

Battery self-heater; core temperature estimation; electric vehicles (EVs); energy saving; extended state observer (ESO)

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) through the ARPA-E NEXTCAR Program [DE-AR0000797]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The onboard battery self-heaters are employed to improve the performance and lifetime of the automotive lithium-ion batteries under cold climates. The battery performance is determined by the core temperature which is significantly higher than the surface temperature during the fast self-heating, while only the surface temperature can be directly measured. By estimating the core temperature to monitor the self-heating condition, the heating time and the energy consumption can be improved. However, the high-frequency heating current and the time-variant battery impedance cannot be measured in real time by a low-sampling-rate battery management system, so that the regular core temperature estimation methods are not applicable during the self-heating. To solve the issues, an online core temperature estimation algorithm based on the lumped thermal-electrical model is developed for the onboard ac self-heater. By implementing an extended state observer to compensate for the effect of the parameter uncertainties, the core temperature can be accurately detected even with the unknown internal resistance and root mean square (RMS) heating current. The experimental validation of 18 650 lithium-ion batteries shows that the core temperature estimation error is within only 1.2 degrees C. As a result, the self-heating time and energy consumption can be reduced by 50%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available