4.7 Article

Automatic Microseismic Events Detection Using Multiscale Morphological Characteristic Function

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 3341-3351

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2953676

Keywords

Microseismic events detection; multiscale mathematical morphology; real-time implementation; signal processing; waveform correlation

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [2016ZX05023004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface-acquired microseismic events are commonly unpredictable and appear as weak signals with low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), which present a significant challenge in microseismic data analysis and events detection. We have developed the multiscale morphology method for automatically detecting microseismic events. The technique is based on the fact that the effective signal and noise have different features in the multiscale morphological section. According to these characteristics, the effective signal can be identified by waveform consistency analysis. The microseismic data are first decomposed into different scales by multiscale morphology decomposition. Then the multiscale morphology characteristic function is calculated by waveform cross correlation approach and the potential microseismic events are evaluated using the peak value of the multiscale morphology characteristic function. Applications of the proposed method on the synthesized data and field data have been explored in this article. Various examples demonstrate that the proposed method has the advantage of suppressing the effect of Gaussian noises adaptively. Furthermore, it is excellent in automatically detecting the low SNR signal so that more microseismic events can be identified. In addition, the method could be applied to other fields, such as in the identification of earthquake signals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available