4.7 Article

Heterodyne Eddy Current Testing Using Magnetoresistive Sensors for Additive Manufacturing Purposes

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages 5793-5800

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.2973547

Keywords

Eddy current testing; giant magnetoresistance; additive manufacturing; laser powder bed fusion; 316L; heterodyning

Funding

  1. Bundesanstalt fur Materialforschung und-prufung within the focus areaMaterials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years additive manufacturing technologies have become widely popular. For complex functional components or low volume production of workpieces, laser powder bed fusion can be used. High safety requirements, e.g. in the aerospace sector, demand extensive quality control. Therefore, offline non-destructive testing methods like computed tomography are used after manufacturing. Recently, for enhanced profitability and practicality online non-destructive testing methods, like optical tomography have been developed. This paper discusses the applicability of eddy current testing with magnetoresistive sensors for laser powder bed fusion parts. For this purpose, high spatial resolution giant magnetoresistance arrays are utilized for testing in combination with a single wire excitation coil. A heterodyne principle minimizes metrology efforts. This principle is compared to conventional signal processing in an eddy current testing setup using an aluminum test sample with artificial surface defects. To evaluate the influence of the powder used in the manufacturing process on eddy current testing and vice versa, a laser powder bed fusion mock-up made from stainless steel powder (316L) is used with artificial surface defects down to $100\mu \text{m}$ . This laser powder bed fusion specimen was then examined using eddy current testing and the underlying principles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available