Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Use of E-values for addressing confounding in observational studies-an empirical assessment of the literature
Manuel R. Blum et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)
Principles of confounder selection
Tyler J. VanderWeele
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Are interventions in reproductive medicine assessed for plausible and clinically relevant effects? A systematic review of power and precision in trials and meta-analyses
K. Stocking et al.
HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2019)
Using the E-Value to Assess the Potential Effect of Unmeasured Confounding in Observational Studies
Sebastien Haneuse et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2019)
Limitations and Misinterpretations of E-Values for Sensitivity Analyses of Observational Studies
John P. A. Ioannidis et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2019)
Web Site and R Package for Computing E-values
Maya B. Mathur et al.
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)
Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value
Tyler J. VanderWeele et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2017)
Sensitivity analysis for the effects of multiple unmeasured confounders
Rolf H. H. Groenwold et al.
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions
Peng Ding et al.
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
P-values and reproductive health: what can clinical researchers learn from the American Statistical Association?
L. V. Farland et al.
HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2016)
Pharmacokinetics of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Injection in Obese and Normal-Weight Women
Divya K. Shah et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM (2014)
ON THE DEFINITION OF A CONFOUNDER
Tyler J. Vanderweele et al.
ANNALS OF STATISTICS (2013)
Overadjustment Bias and Unnecessary Adjustment in Epidemiologic Studies
Enrique F. Schisterman et al.
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs
Ian Shrier et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2008)
Share Paper
