4.5 Review

Candidate genes for hereditary colorectal cancer: Mutational screening and systematic review

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 41, Issue 9, Pages 1563-1576

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1002/humu.24057

Keywords

cancer genetics; cancer predisposition; early-onset colorectal cancer; familial colorectal cancer; germline mutation; hereditary cancer

Funding

  1. Scientific Foundation Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer [INVES19022TERR]
  2. Fundacion Olga Torres [FOT2018-2019]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya [PERIS SLT002/16/0037]
  4. Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca [2017SGR1282]
  5. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CIBERONC CB16/12/00234]
  6. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [SAF2015-68016-R, SAF2016-80888-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genome-wide approaches applied for the identification of new hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) genes, identified several potential causal genes, includingRPS20,IL12RB1,LIMK2,POLE2,MRE11,POT1,FAN1,WIF1,HNRNPA0,SEMA4A,FOCAD,PTPN12,LRP6,POLQ,BLM,MCM9, and the epigenetic inactivation ofPTPRJ. Here we attempted to validate the association between variants in these genes and nonpolyposis CRC by performing a mutational screening of the genes andPTPRJpromoter methylation analysis in 473 familial/early-onset CRC cases, a systematic review of the published cases, and assessment of allele frequencies in control population. In the studied cohort, 24 (5%) carriers of (predicted) deleterious variants in the studied genes and no constitutionalPTPRJepimutations were identified. Assessment of allele frequencies in controls compared with familial/early-onset patients with CRC showed association with increased nonpolyposis CRC risk of disruptive variants inRPS20,IL12RB1,POLE2,MRE11andPOT1, and ofFAN1c.149T>G (p.Met50Arg). Lack of association was demonstrated forLIMK2,PTPN12,LRP6,PTPRJ,POLQ,BLM,MCM9andFOCADvariants. Additional studies are required to provide conclusive evidence forSEMA4A,WIF1,HNRNPA0 c.-110G>C, andFOCADlarge deletions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available