4.7 Article

Room and high temperature flexural failure of spark plasma sintered boron carbide

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages 7001-7013

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.088

Keywords

Boron carbide; Spark plasma sintering; Flexural mechanical properties

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H04163] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dense (95-98.6%) bulk boron carbide prepared by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) in Ar or N-2 atmospheres were subject to three-point flexural tests at room and at 1600 degrees C. Eight different consolidation conditions were used via SPS of commercially available B4C powder. Resulting specimens had similar grain size not exceeding 4 mu m and room-temperature bending strength (sigma(25) (degrees C)) of 300-600 MPa, suggesting that difference in sigma(25) (degrees C) m is due to development of secondary phases in monolithic boron carbide ceramics during SPS processing. To explain such difference the composition of boron carbide and secondary phases observed by XRD and Raman spectroscopy. The variation in intensity of the Raman peak at 490 cm(-1) of boron carbide suggests modification of the boron carbide composition and a higher intensity correlates with a higher room temperature bending strength (sigma(25) (degrees C)) and Vickers hardness (HV). Secondary phases can modify the level of mechanical characteristics within some general trends that are not dependent on additives (with some exceptions) or technologies. Namely, HV increases, sigma(25) (degrees C) decreases, and the ratio sigma(1600 degrees C)/sigma(25 degrees C) (sigma(1600 degrees C) - bending strength at 1600 degrees C) is lower when fracture toughness (K-IC) is higher. The ratio sigma(1600 degrees C)/sigma(25 degrees C) shows two regions of low and high K-IC delimited by K-IC=4.1 MPa m(0.5): in the low K-IC region, boron carbide specimens are produced in nitrogen. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available