Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using ablation index-guided high power (50 W) for pulmonary vein isolation with or without esophageal temperature probe (the AI-HP ES0 II)

BACKGROUND High-power, short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates the procedure and improve effectiveness; however, esophageal injury remains a safety concern. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring during high-power ablation for PVI in terms of endoscopic esophageal lesion. METHODS Patients with symptomatic AF underwent ablation index-guided high-power (AI-HP) PVI (50 W; AI anterior wall/posterior wall: 550/400). In the first consecutive set of patients, an insulated esophageal temperature probe was used for LET monitoring (cutoff LET >39 degrees C) (group A). In the second consecutive set of patients, the probe was not used (group B). All patients were scheduled to undergo esophageal endoscopy 1-3 days after ablation. RESULTS A total of 120 patients (60 group A; 60 group B) were included in the study (mean age 67.8 years; 64% male). Baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Procedural PVI was achieved in all patients. First-pass PVI rate was 96.6%. Mean procedural radiofrequency (RF) time was 11.5 minutes, mean procedural time was 55.5 minutes, and fluoroscopic time was 5.6 minutes. Mean contact force at the LA posterior wall was 23 g, and mean RF ablation time at the LA posterior wall was 3.2 minutes. Two patients in group A and 1 patient in group B had endoscopic small esophageal lesions (P = .99). No serious procedural adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION Among patients undergoing AI-HP (50 W) PVI, the incidences of ablation-related endoscopic esophageal lesion in patients with and those without use of a temperature probe for LET monitoring (cutoff 39 degrees C) were comparably low.