4.5 Article

The Potential Health Care Costs And Resource Use Associated With COVID-19 In The United States

Journal

HEALTH AFFAIRS
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 927-935

Publisher

PROJECT HOPE
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00426

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [R01HS023317]
  3. US Agency for International Development [AID-OAA-A-15-00064]
  4. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [U01HD086861, 5R01HD086013-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, one of the major concerns is the direct medical cost and resource use burden imposed on the US health care system. We developed a Monte Carlo simulation model that represented the US population and what could happen to each person who got infected. We estimated resource use and direct medical costs per symptomatic infection and at the national level, with various attack rates (infection rates), to understand the potential economic benefits of reducing the burden of the disease. A single symptomatic COVID-19 case could incur a median direct medical cost of $3,045 during the course of the infection alone. If 80 percent of the US population were to get infected, the result could be a median of 44.6 million hospitalizations, 10.7 million intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, 6.5 million patients requiring a ventilator, 249.5 million hospital bed days, and $654.0 billion in direct medical costs over the course of the pandemic. If 20 percent of the US population were to get infected, there could be a median of 11.2 million hospitalizations, 2.7 million ICU admissions, 1.6 million patients requiring a ventilator, 62.3 million hospital bed days, and $163.4 billion in direct medical costs over the course of the pandemic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available