4.4 Article

Microbial keratitis in Sydney, Australia: risk factors, patient outcomes, and seasonal variation

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04681-0

Keywords

Keratitis; Bacterial keratitis; Fungal keratitis; Infection; Cornea

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Government
  2. University of Sydney, Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To provide recent data on patient demographics, clinical profile and outcomes of patients with microbial keratitis over a 5-year period at the Sydney Eye Hospital, and to identify seasonal variations of the main causative organisms. Method A retrospective study of patients with a clinical diagnosis of microbial keratitis and corneal scrape performed between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016. Clinical information was gathered from medical records and pathology data. Results One thousand fifty-two eyes from 979 patients with a mean age of 54.7 +/- 21.5 years (range 18-100 years) were included. The majority of cases were bacterial (65%) followed by polymicrobial (2.4%), fungi (2.3%), and culture-negative (31%). Common risk factors for microbial keratitis were contact lens wear (63%) and previous topical steroid use (24%). Factors significantly associated with poor patient outcomes in the multivariate model were age, visual acuity, and epithelial defect size (p < 0.05). Patients with fungal or polymicrobial keratitis presented with worse clinical features at initial and final presentation (p < 0.05). There was a significant variation in the occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p = 0.018) and fungal keratitis (predominately made up of Candida and Fusarium species) (p = 0.056) in the hottest seasons. Conclusion Poorer outcomes are more likely to be seen in older patients and those presenting with poor visual acuity and large epithelial defects at the initial presentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available