4.7 Article

Climate Models and Remote Sensing Retrievals Neglect Substantial Desert Dust Asphericity

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019GL086592

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) under the Future Investigators in NASA Earth and Space Science and Technology (FINESST) program [80NSSC19K1346]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1552519, 1856389]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [416816480]
  4. Academy of Finland [285421]
  5. University of California President's Postdoctoral Fellowship
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [285421, 285421] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate models and remote sensing retrievals generally assume that dust aerosols are spherical or spheroidal. However, measurements show that dust aerosols deviate substantially from spherical and spheroidal shapes, as ratios of particle length to width (the aspect ratio) and height to width (height-to-width ratio) deviate substantially from unity. Here, we quantify dust asphericity by compiling dozens of measurements of aspect ratio and height-to-width ratio across the globe. We find that the length is on average 5 times larger than the height and that climate models and remote sensing retrievals underestimate this asphericity by a factor of similar to 3-5. Compiled measurements further suggest that North African dust becomes more aspherical during transport, whereas Asian dust might become less aspherical. We obtain globally-averaged shape distributions, from which we find that accounting for dust asphericity increases gravitational settling lifetime by similar to 20%. This increased lifetime helps explain the underestimation of coarse dust transport by models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available