4.3 Article

Identifying blood pressure loci whose effects are modulated by multiple lifestyle exposures

Journal

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 629-641

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22292

Keywords

blood pressure; gene-environment interaction; lifestyle risk score; loci discovery; multiple lifestyle exposures

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N02-HL-64278, R01HL118305, T32HL091823]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R21 AA024888-01, UL1 TR002345]
  3. American Heart Association [18CDA34110116]
  4. NIH [R21 AA024888-01, UL1 TR002345]
  5. Boston University [N01-HC-25195, HHSN268201500001I]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although multiple lifestyle exposures simultaneously impact blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular health, most analysis so far has considered each single lifestyle exposure (e.g., smoking) at a time. Here, we exploit gene-multiple lifestyle exposure interactions to find novel BP loci. For each of 6,254 Framingham Heart Study participants, we computed lifestyle risk score (LRS) value by aggregating the risk of four lifestyle exposures (smoking, alcohol, education, and physical activity) on BP. Using the LRS, we performed genome-wide gene-environment interaction analysis in systolic and diastolic BP using the joint 2 degree of freedom (DF) and 1 DF interaction tests. We identified one genome-wide significant (p < 5 x 10(-8)) and 11 suggestive (p < 1 x 10(-6)) loci. Gene-environment analysis using single lifestyle exposures identified only one of the 12 loci. Nine of the 12 BP loci detected were novel. Loci detected by the LRS were located within or nearby genes with biologically plausible roles in the pathophysiology of hypertension, including KALRN, VIPR2, SNX1, and DAPK2. Our results suggest that simultaneous consideration of multiple lifestyle exposures in gene-environment interaction analysis can identify additional loci missed by single lifestyle approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available